Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Aaal well indeed.

Aamir Khan’s annual Christmas present has opened to a fantastic response. I was expecting a lot from this film for 2 reasons – first because it stars Aamir Khan  and second because it is directed by Raju Hirani. From the two earlier films of Hirani it is clear that he literally thinks out of the box and is secure enough in his rather ethical outlook on life, to try and convert the cynical viewer. To get the audience to agree with Gandhi in India is astonishing. And yet he managed it triumphantly in his last film. In 3 idiots he has a much easier task. That of telling us that our education system stinks. We know that already, and agree wholeheartedly.

Aamir does his role of a genius-with-not-the-slightest-interest-in-marks as brilliantly as one could expect from him. Am more than a little sick of the ageing 40+ stars playing students, one of the reasons I was not sure about this film – but that just doesn’t come up as a glitch, as Aamir looks seriously young. Madhavan and Sharman Joshi who make up the other 2 idiots, are reliably good too. Kareena Kapoor plays the simple girl well enough, but really, there is not much for her to do. ( Manish Malhotra dresses her in pretty but fuss-free clothes for a change and she looks super). Boman Irani shuffles around in his typical professor attire looking like grim the reaper and inducing you to chuckles.

The story uses Chetan Bhagat’s 5 point-someone as a base but makes some significant changes, the most important one being the mystery behind Rancho (Aamir). Hirani’s refusal to be in awe of the wealthy or the titled or the certified, makes up much of the altered vision in this story. The black-and-white take on the poverty-stricken parents of Sharman whose filmily sad lives still manages to evoke good-natured-humour must be a first for hindi cinema. The movie packs in every dramatic situation – from the runaway bride to natural birth by engineers-turned-nervous-obstetricians. It’s all there - masala entertainment that still tells you the hero could be from some godforsaken part of unmainstream India. I believe the critics are holding back their stars after gushing about something as insipid as New York. Fikar not – you are going to love this one.

7 comments:

  1. You know that was my first thought when they announced the casting- why the aging (male) stars? And I like AK. Oh well. Rancho is such a strange name! I heard a lot about the birthing scene and was cringing from the descriptions :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. couchpapaya - ya the male stars - no concern for the female viewers at all ;)only the heroine has to look like a patakha. But the film is a funride. you would like it am sure - the birthing scene is cool. I was prepared to be embarassed when it started but Hirani's general attitude towards women is very unobjectifying - that helped.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have been hearing a lot about this one, will certainly see it. I too was not excited about the 40+ stars playing 20somethings. Have you seen "National Lampoon's Animal House", possibly the best satire on College Life.
    And of course, Hollywood is not much better re: "women as patakha". OK, OK, I will confess that I enjoy those depictions as much as the next man. And to make up for it, I will write a nice review about women bloggers & cooks (Julia & Julia). Meaning to do so for a long time, maybe now I will atempt it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Samir,
    Just saw Julie and Julia. Lovely film. both amy adams and meryl streep are stuper, no? saw it after CP recommended it and glad i did.do revu it. it willbe wonderful to read your take on it.
    as for the patakha women, i wouldnt mind if the reverse trend was also followed. I feel Hollywood objectifies its men too,so that's good :)..........Hrihik is a one-off type in Bollywood and now it seems he is drowning himself in his sad love story with barbara mori and not caring about his fans....tchh..

    ReplyDelete
  5. Namaste,
    Found you via ONEPHILE's blog. Saw this a couple days back in a nearly full theater in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Nice to see so many people out despite the frigid weather to see this. Agreed the Aamir managed to pull off the college thing, how I don't know, but he did it, as did Madahavan and Joshi. Very cute, light film, with many masala twists. One of the most enjoyable of the year. I loved the end as well as the hilarious black and white melodrama scenes. Too many bathroom scenes for me, that's my only complaint really, and not enough music/dance, but a solid 7.5 out of 10 for me.

    All the best!
    Sita-ji

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sita-ji :)

    Welcome to my blog and Thank you for your comment. Ya the overhead loo scenes were pretty unnecessary. Yahan pe there's a controversy snowballing over why the makers did not credit chetan bhagat the writer in the opening credits and instead credited the story to the scriptwriter.The story framework is entirely based on the book so am disappointed in aamir for getting so stingy with giving credit where its due. very bollywood attitude - take a story, and make your mom/aunt tweak it a bit and give her the credit for it. would expect taht of the johars and chopras, not aamir.

    anyway, movie was super and deserves the success.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yword,
    Right, a bit similar with Slumdog / Q&A, (though of course that's not Bollyowwd) seems as though author was not given sufficient credit. A simple, "based on the book by..." on movie posters would be best in these cases. Yes I was just reading them discussing the credit over "5 Point Someone" here, those comments begin with squarecutatul and the blogger, Memsaab, has some interesting first hand experience with how this occurred:
    http://memsaabstory.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/3-idiots-2009/#comments
    Enjoy!
    All the best!
    Sita-ji

    ReplyDelete